Speaker
Edmund G Howe
- Center for the Study of Traumatic Stress
- USA
Presentation
Changes in psychotherapeutic thinking over the past 50 years
- April 19-20, 2027
- Paris, France
Biography
Edmund G Howe received his undergraduate degree at Yale and his MD at Columbia. He attended Rutgers University Law School and then received his law degree at Catholic University. He joined the USU faculty in 1977 and is a Professor in the Department of Psychiatry, Professor in the Department of Medicine, Director of Programs in Medical Ethics, and Senior Scientist, Center for the study of Traumatic Stress, at the Uniformed Services University in Bethesda, Maryland. His research has focused on medical ethics with an emphasis on ethics in military medicine and clinical care at the end of life. He has been the Editor-in-Chief of The Journal of Clinical Ethics since its inception.
Abstract
There have been several substantial changes in thinking regarding how we can maximize our psychotherapeutic outcomes over the past fifty years. I will review here those that seem to most benefit patients. First will be a renewed place for paternalism. Therapists might inform patients directly of key considerations they miss due to stress or characteristic omissions in their thinking. This discussion will include ways to avoid past harms paternalistic interventions have brought about. Potential gains of interrupting patients to better catch what is present will be discussed, again with necessary safeguards. Positive and negative effects of indirect suggestions. Patients may especially values therapists positive regard because they value them so highly. Merely plausible effects therapists share only to inform them may, on the other hand, have negative effects. Role playing may bring about unique gains, but again with risks that can be avoided. New views regarding therapists setting boundaries may radically change and improve patients’ outcomes, and this is only one way in which therapists seeing their patients’ behaviors as interpersonally- as well as intra-personally-based may enhance their outcomes. In that all these interventions may benefit patients, they model those that as therapists should continually seek to newly identify as they seek primarily to help their patients.